-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday, October 23 at 09:17 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:34:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> I don't know *authoritatively*, but I believe there are two 
>> answers: the first being backwards compatibility (i.e. that by 
>> default, mutt should behave as it always has, not suddenly start 
>> sticking files somewhere; that would be a privacy breach waiting 
>> to happen), and second being that mutt's default mode of operation 
>> is not remote mailbox browsing (though that's what many people 
>> primarily use it for), but rather local mbox or Maildir browsing. 
>> Mutt has so many config options, the defaults have to be geared to 
>> a particular use case. In this case, mutt's default use-case is 
>> fetching mail out of /var/spool/mail/$user and depositing it into 
>> some sort of ~/mail mbox. Header caching may not be much of a win, 
>> and message caching *certainly* isn't useful in that situation.
>
> That mostly makes sense, but you must have *much* smaller folders 
> than I do; I'm doing all my mail locally, and routinely have to wait 
> 10-30 seconds for mutt to open a folder.

Me? Heck no; I use mutt to read mail from my IMAP server. My 
understanding is that the utility of header caching depends on the 
storage format - for mbox, it's (supposedly) not as important as, say, 
Maildir or MH or IMAP. But <shrug>; the issue of unexpected privacy 
breaches is reason enough not to make it default-on.

~Kyle
- -- 
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, 
and wrong.
                                                       -- H. L. Mencken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!

iEYEARECAAYFAkkBU+oACgkQBkIOoMqOI14Q0QCdHuI7t9bOGyJaTnJLmeLKZEMt
CtIAoLIn4kZ/9OFfO1CwRB75NITTOsIN
=zVjG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to