On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:44:35AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams <nicolas.willi...@sun.com> wrote: > | > That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside > | > mutt. > | > | It's a terminfo / libslang issue. > > Lucky the screen internal terminal and xterm both base off the ANSI > stuff, eh?
:) > | > | screen -ls output > | > | gets mangled, but that's screen's fault: > | > | There are screens on: > | > | [...] > | > | 3820.mutt-30mar2010-11:06 Re_Foobars_Request_1 (Detached) > | > > | > Cool. So, working for you now? > | > | Turns out I can screen -r <pid>, so, yes. > > Ah. I mostly use screen through a wrapper of my own called "scr" that > numbers the listing, so I'd be going "scr 5" or whatever. I do the same (I call my wrapper rscreen), but it gets fooled by the run-on fields above. In any case, I will not use the -m option, since I don't want a whole new screen but a new window. > | > Glad to here it. Any specific problems remaining to address? > | > | The replied flag issue. > > You could be optimistic and mark it at the point you commence the > reply. Hmmm, maybe. Or I could have a script go through my sent folder and searching for the messages they reply to just to set the replied flag. > | The connection sharing and password caching > | issues. I can live. > > Connection sharing? See other posts on this thread. > | (Actually, _I_ don't need this, as I'm happy to postpone messages when I > | need to switch gears. But I know of at least one user who desperately > | needs a new MUA but will not adopt mutt because of this missing > | feature.) > > Ah. Well I know I really wanted it too, hence the script. > I never did come to grips with the postponed folder approach. Thanks for your script and usage info, Nico --
