On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:23:23PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2010-07-02, lee <l...@yun.yagibdah.de> wrote: > > > Having that said, it comes to mind that more users of mutt might make > > use of return reciepts if there was well designed support for them > > Doubit it. Well designed support for evil is still evil. > > 1/2 :)
There's nothing evil about return reciepts. > > ... One way to address privacy concerns could be, for example, to > > queue the reciepts one wants to send and then send them all at once > > automatically, perhaps once or twice a day at fixed times. Perhaps > > that's a poor idea, I don't know. > > It's the actual sending of receipts that's a problem. I don't see how > queueing them up helps. Then don't send them if you don't want to. Queueing them could be do done for not to disclose when you handled the message.
