m...@raf.org wrote:

> Jim Graham wrote:
> 
> > I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
> > using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to
> > html, but it wasn't html.  It was limited to simple text markup such
> > as bold, simple colors, *maybe* italic and underline (don't remember),
> > and if I remeember correctly, not much else.
> > 
> > Does anyone remember what that is (or was) called, and/or what the
> > RFC for it is?  I do remember that Mutt supported it (and it was one
> > of the very few that did).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >    --jim
> 
> hi jim,
> 
> it was probably text/richtext (not application/x-rtf).

oops. i mean text/enriched.

> the rfc is http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1523.txt
> eudora knew about it as well.
> 
> cheers,
> raf
> 

Reply via email to