On Fri,May 09 04:24:PM, Jean-Rene David wrote: > > Not at all. Did you try it? > > You would have two files to edit if you did: > > vim -c ":e /path/to/file" > > or > > vim /path/to/file > > But not with: > > vim -c ":r /path/to/file" > I did try it, and arrived to the !cat idea for that reason, but, for the sake of being 100% sure, I'll try it again and report back. > > Maybe have a different mapping for 'e' in the > index versus the compose menu?
Sneaky.. but, it could work. -- GG
