stuart wrote:
> 
> Tom Metro wrote:
>> stuart wrote:
>>> Humm, but I can't find what I'm thinking of (using a 74CH00 chip,
>>> half as a monostable multi vibrator operating at 40KHz and the other
>>> half to help gate the signal).
>> That might be because the modulation required by some devices may be 
>> more sophisticated than simple asynchronous amplitude modulation. Some 
>> devices may require frequency or phase modulation, or AM that is 
>> synchronous with the carrier wave.
>>
>> Although according to:
>> http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/Infrared-HOWTO/infrared-howto-c-lirc-irda.html
>>
>>   "The IrDA Physical Layer is totally incompatible with the DASK
>>   modulation used in IR remote controls."
> 
> Yeah, if I recall right ... irda (like on a Palm Pilot) is a bunch of 
> pulses where I think 0s and 1s are marked by either having or not having 
> a pulse.  Ask is more like pulses of ~40KHz modulated light.  I would 
> guess irda is generally faster but only works over a short distance 
> whereas ask is slow but can be filtered (@ ~40KHz) so can work over 
> longer distances.   (The accuracy of the above is questionable as I'm 
> being lazy and not looking anything up. (i.e. [needs citation]))
> 
>> I assume the D in DASK stands for digital. Amplitude-shift keying (ASK) 
>> is described here:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amplitude-shift_keying
>>
>> and in its simplest form would be achievable with the circuit you describe.
>>
>> This site:
>> http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Circuits/Interface/mod_det.htm
>>
>> which has a schematic for building an IR receiver for use with a scope 
>> for observing remote control signals (most likely overkill, and with a 
>> decent scope you'd do fine with a photodiode or a phototransistor and a 
>> few components), also backs up the idea that the modulation is simple AM.
>>
>> That site also has a pile of remote control extender circuits:
>> http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Circuits/Interface/rce.htm
>>
>> which could be adapted for use with a PC.
>>
>>
>>> Instead I found things like:
>>> http://www.lirc.org/improved_transmitter.html
>>> ...which need each pulse controlled as you said above.
>> And half of that circuit is just trying to achieve creating a power 
>> source for the LEDs from the serial port. If you wired up a power 
>> supply, you could probably do it with half the components.
> 
> Yes, I noticed that too.  Consider that if you did load up the Palm 
> Pilot w/the code to produce ASK that (reportedly) you need to be w/in a 
> few feet of the receiver for it to work. So having enough power is 
> important. (Point your *digital* camera at your remote control.  It's 
> quite bright.) This all begs the question: "At that distance, why not 
> just reach out and use you hand?".
> 
>>> ...I'd search the hifi-remote.com web site.  Chances are very good
>>> that someone has already captured the codes you are interested in and
>>> published them...
>> Agreed. I wouldn't recommend using a scope to reverse engineer the 
>> actual codes. I was just suggesting using it to verify that the general 
>> signal characteristics, such as modulation frequency and type, match 
>> between the original remote and the simulated remote.
>>
>>   -Tom
> 
> I think it's time (where does that stuff come from any ways?) to try 
> some things out on the work bench.  Regardless, I think I'll add some of 
> your links to the hardwarehowto along w/some possible mvpmc 
> enhancements.  I've always thought an IR blaster on the mvpmc box would 
> be nice (i.e. Get rid of the TV remote!).
> 
> 

Ok, added this to the mvpmc hardware howto:

http://www.mvpmc.org/mvpmc_hardware_howto.html#s11




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Mvpmc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users
mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/

Reply via email to