I vote against turning MLO into a PIM, it's not a PIM and there are plenty of 
those around.  It's a Task Outliner and as such I don't think it needs a 
calendar.   In fact part of it's strength is the lack of a calendar, because it 
makes you address the primary concern - tasks.  The lack of a calendar makes 
you establish things like views that address the specifics of what you require, 
rather than relying on a general overview that a calendar might provide.
Knowing the workload you have outstanding can only be aided by things like MLO, 
but I think if you rely on any tool to inform you how busy you are then it's 
time to take stock of your commitments.  MLO isn't about scheduling an 
appointment for Friday, it's about making an overall plan and addressing areas 
of your life.  Breaking those down into goals, projects and specific tasks.  In 
a way it doesn't ask you to focus on the completion of a goal or project, it 
asks you to address the next step - the next task. I think if you find yourself 
looking to add a calendar aspect you sort of miss the point of MLO.
Having no calendar in MLO allows you to keep the two aspects separate, tasks 
and schedule.  Now to my mind that is the best combination because very few 
applications can combine both aspects to form anything with a semblance of 
sense.   I think only Above&Beyond with it's Dynamic Scheduling manages to 
merge both aspects into one seamless application, but even that has issues.   
The lack of a calendar in MLO means you are free to use anything which suits 
you, Google, Outlook, Time&Chaos, Paper, Diary you are not pigeon holed into 
using MLO just because that is where the bulk of your information is stored.  
As I said before MLO isn't a PIM and I don't think it should become one any 
time soon.  
Overall I think people believe a calendar will make a significant difference to 
MLO. I don't think it will and if anything I think it may cause more problems 
than it resolves.
All the best
Steve  

Original message
From: "Mark Levison" 
To: [email protected]
Received: 07/09/2010 18:40:21
Subject: Re: [MLO] Re: MLO without a Calendar

Please help make this clear to Andrey - go to: 
http://mlo.uservoice.com/forums/9235-general and vote for the suggestion that 
is already there. Add your own suggestions. If enough people start to use the 
site it will give Andrey a better idea where to put his time and effort.
Cheers
Mark

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Richard Collings <[email protected]> wrote:
I would agree that MLO is good for helping decide what you should work on next 
and making sure you don’t forget stuff but in my world at least people say to 
me ‘Can you do this Friday?’ and I need some way to work this out given all my 
other commitments (and it is something that I am truly dreadful at – so I end 
up working into the night very often).
Something like MS Project is way over the top – I just need a tool which helps 
me visualise my upcoming work with some indication of what I have to get done 
each day over the next week or two and some indication of the scale of work 
involved on each day.    As I have all this information in MLO already it would 
be brilliant if Andrey could find a way of presenting this sort of view
I have been using the Pomodoro technique to some degree (where you measure time 
in 30 minute blocks) and I think there is some considerable mileage in 
developing this further.
In terms of large scale new developments, this would get my vote very time.
Richard

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Neal
Sent: 07 September 2010 4:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MLO] Re: MLO without a Calendar

I'm a big fan of this concept.  I use flags to define groups of work.  Every 
task fits into one of these groups.
Projects
People 
Paperwork
Physical work
Personal stuff
My calendar simply defines which flag I am working on.  I then filter flags in 
MLO views and let my MLO order decide which task to work on.
I found this works out better for me then trying to pre-plan which task I am 
going to schedule at what time.  At this point I no longer want a calendar for 
pre-planning.
It still would be useful to have a calendar for time tracking though.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, that seems like a decent solution.
One more thing though, when do I process to-do tasks that aren't in my
alloted times?
For example, "Call XYZ regarding blah blah". Tasks like these could
pop up un-announced.
Do I just interrpt whatever I was doing to perform these kind of tasks
or what?
On Sep 7, 1:38 am, Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey, Mike--
>
> I am in the same boat that you are in, but I found a bit of stop-gap
> solution which is:
>
> 1) Using Google Calendar, allocate time to various projects (in my
> case, contexts/allocation buckets) each week.
> 2) In MLO, add another context to each task for the project.
> 3) When the event comes up on the calendar, switch to MLO and filter
> the To-Do view for the given time allocation.
>
> It is not perfect, but it does solve the problem and is available
> today. As long as you are disciplined about respecting your allocated
> time, it will work and deliver results.
>
> On Sep 5, 9:02 am, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > MLO seems like probably the best task management software around, but
> > it's missing a critical component - the calendar.
>
> > I currently have a few projects I want to start and each of them have
> > various goals and "checkpoints".
> > I'd like to allot a particular amount of time to each project
> > throughout the week in such a way that I won't really have to manually
> > plan what to do in each session - it should be taken care of by the
> > project's massive to-do list so I could just pick off where I have
> > left off earlier.
>
> > Without a built-in Calendar, MLO can only be used with software such
> > as Outlook, which may be utterly useless to some of us (I'm a student
> > - I don't need the burden of Outlook because I use Gmail for my
> > emailing needs).
>
> > Is a Calendar feature being planned for a future revision?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
  Mark Levison | Agile Pain Relief Consulting | Agile Editor @ InfoQ 
Blog | Twitter | Office: (613) 862-2538
Recent Entries: Self Inflicted Agile Injuries, Why use an Agile Coach 
 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to