On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Martin Renold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:46:40AM +0200, Jon Nordby wrote: >> On 4 February 2011 00:36, Martin Renold <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I think git master is in good shape to make a full release, rather than >> > just backporting the critical bugfixes. >> The behavior changes in device and brush selection handling is fairly >> big, but if you think it is good then lets go for it. > > I admit that I did not do a lot of testing with that yet. Andrew, do you > have an oppinion on this? > > We are in the lucky situation to have several users who work with git and > give useful feedback from time to time. Maybe we should keep with the > tradition of ultra-conservative maintainence releases for the others?
Jon, I've sent you an initial pt_BR.po translation file a couple of weeks ago, as I had not a way of setting up git to make the complete "request merge" process on the date. DId you get that file?: I got no reply from you. I will be more than happy to update it for release 0.9.1 (if it hit span box r was acidentally erased, I can just re-email it) js -><- >> > Speaking about data loss, this bug would be a nice fix, too: >> > https://gna.org/bugs/?17473 >> Do we have consensus on how to solve this? I've already stated my >> opinion in the matter, but do note that resolving it in that matter >> would be a (again) fairly significant behavior change. > > Hm right maybe not the kind of thing to rush into a release last minute. > Will comment on the bugreport. > > -- > Martin Renold > > _______________________________________________ > Mypaint-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss > _______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
