>for example "experimental/1pixel" is now >broader than 1 pixel. (Not our most important brush.)
That seems ok as long as it's possible for me to fix it to actually be 1pixel again; or at least that proper hard-edged dab rendering is still possible. I'll check out if that is the case ASAP. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Martin Renold <[email protected]> wrote: > hi Micael > hi David > > I think your patch is good now. But it affects existing brushes. > > David (or anyone else working on brushes): could you please test your > brushes with this branch? > > https://gitorious.org/~mdias/mypaint/mdiass-mypaint/commits/master > git clone git://gitorious.org/~mdias/mypaint/mdiass-mypaint.git > > I would like to know if it's okay to use this for 1.1, or if we better do > it > after the release, to give more time to check and re-tune brushes. Most > brushes profit from this change I think, especially dynamic ink brushes. > > Some are definitively changed, for example "experimental/1pixel" is now > broader than 1 pixel. (Not our most important brush.) > > Some small sharp ink brushes may look a bit blurred now. I have noticed > this > with "deevad/soft_dip_pen" from set #2. Maybe they can be retuned. The > settings "hardness", "anti-aliasing" and "opacity" are good candidates. > > -- > Martin Renold > > _______________________________________________ > Mypaint-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
