I have rebased and pushed the first two of your commits into master. Let's build on that.
Not sure if I'm happy yet with the last commit (the boolean). Are you working on a different approach? Also, strings are not frozen any more, it would be nice to have some explanation in the brushsetting tooltips (brushsettings.json) about what's actually having what effect now. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:26:49PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > We can surely make snapping a slider which will basically lerp between > snapped and non-snapped, but we still need something that will enable/disable > the new aa algorithm, otherwise pixel-sharp dabs won't be possible, and the > current workaround (aa=0 is no-aa, aa=0.001 is normal aa with little feather) > is asking to confuse users IMO. > > > On 16/12/12 16:23 Martin Renold wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:38:09PM +0000, Micael wrote: > > > > Maybe we should create a new slider for enabling/disabling the AA+snapping > > (<0.5 is disabled, >=0.5 is enabled) for now while we don't have the > > ability to create checkboxes? > > > I don't see the lack of checkboxes as a limitation, it's more an > encouragement to create smooth brushsettings that can be mapped to any input > without creating glitches. Actually it's not so hard to think of something > between fully snapping to integer pixels and not snapping at all. If this > seems all too complicated, at the very least we can make in-between values > stand for the per-dab probability to snap. > > -- > > Martin Renold > > > -- Martin Renold _______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
