Hey, I don't really like the idea of brush diameter in inch and cm ; I do a lot of artwork for digital only output, and dimensions in inch or cm would depend of printed resolution only. Not what happen on screen. I'm fine with pixels unit. -David
_____________________ http://www.davidrevoy.com On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:52 PM, José Américo Gobbo <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > I've introduced this argument in others thread but I think useful to > explain this better. For me the interactions with and the tool options on > bar status are interesting and useful, and mainly to brush instances, the > main tool to paint in MyPaint :) > > In this instance would be useful to show the infos of brush, the main, > perhaps, is the 'size'. > > For me is a bit strange to work with logarithmic scale as on MyPaint or in > pixels as in Gimp... yes... you're always using our mental converter. So is > useful to have the size brush with the unit that is more common for each > work, e.g, a print work (offset)... for instance, to have the size of brush > in 'mm' or 'inch'. The variables of this feature, perhaps, already exist in > the frame feature. > I understand useful the nominal size brush value and not the effective > with pressure working in real time. > > Is very difficult maintain the focus in large works... e.g., A3 plus, > A2... many times the lines become very thin because is very hard always to > know the effectively the size brush for each zoom (in or out). For ink > process this feature could be very useful... to resolve this I've made the > fixed brushes on MyPaint... but I made the debug of size strokes on gimp... > :) > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Mypaint-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
