Hi!
On Mar 21, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:22:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mar 20, Basil Hussain wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The original message below was posted to the BugTraq mailing list. Have the
> > > developers seen this? I know it talks about version mysql-3.20.32a (which is
> > > ancient), but he mentions that it affects other versions.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I don't run my MySQL server as root, so I'm not worried. :)
> > >
> >
> > You shouldn't.
> >
> > MySQL-3.23 is not vulnerable.
>
> How did you determine that?
>
>
> Sorry to contradict, but have a look:
>
[...]
> Did I overlook something?
No, it's me who overlooked something :-(
Sorry for confusion...
Anyway, this would be fixed asap.
Regards,
Sergei
--
MySQL Development Team
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Sergei Golubchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, http://www.mysql.com/
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Osnabrueck, Germany
<___/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
