Essentially the spirit of the license is, if a company builds a system of some kind where the database facilities are provided by MySQL and wish to sell that system as a whole without a GPL or other accepted open license then they will be required to purchase a license for each copy of the server they distribute. The company distributing the system would generally pay this to MySQL and include it in the costing/pricing of their product.
Does that clarify things any further for you? Regards, Lachlan -----Original Message----- From: DebugasRu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2004 5:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: On the licensing once again 1) LM> If your software is licensed under either the GPL-compatible Free Software LM> License as defined by the Free Software Foundation or approved by OSI, then LM> use our GPL licensed version. 2) LM> If you distribute a proprietary application in any way, and you are not LM> licensing and distributing your source code under GPL, you need to purchase LM> a commercial license of MySQL To be honest i don't understand the double licensing issues at all. Does the second part 2) applies to the developer of proprietary software only or does it apply to its users too ? Why a user cannot install and use MySql under GPL and then install and use proprietary software under whatever licence he got it. Or do you want to say that the end user can in general use MySQL under GPL, but as soon as he tries to use it with that particular proprietary software then he can no longer use MySQL under GPL ? This seems to contradict the GPL license terms -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
