Thanks for the article. I'll check it out. Throughput of 4600K/s is great. How's latency?
-Ed > -----Original Message----- > So if the image was say 200K in size, the metadata for the image would > be 1 row in a table, and the image data would be 4 rows in the data > table. 3 full 64K rows + 1 partially used rows. > > There is a good article/sample code here on the kind of technique we > started with: > http://php.dreamwerx.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6 > > Using chunked data, apache/php only needs to pull row by row(64k) and > deliver to the client, keeping the resultset size low = memory > overhead low. > > The storage servers (mysql storage) I have tested on the LAN; them > storing and retreiving data from mysql (using FTP gateway) at rates of > 4600K/sec.. which is I think the fastest speed my laptop network card > could deliver. > > That's pretty fast.. Rare day when most internet users can talk to > servers at those speeds. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
