Yes, that's what i said. He is trying to ovverride data consistency, and read uncommitted is so possible. So why not use it if it solves the problem. else, read uncommitted sould be droped from mysql.
But i agree with you Mathias Selon Martijn Tonies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > look also using READ UNCOMMITTED > > > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/innodb-transaction-isolation.html > > Read UNCOMMITTED is an abomination and should be avoided. > > With regards, > > Martijn Tonies > Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL > Server > Upscene Productions > http://www.upscene.com > > -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
