I'm just curious as to which would have better performance for my needs.

backend is a MSSQL server and I want to replicate it into a MySQL
Frontend for user accesses.

replication would be done via "mysqlimport/load data infile". I'm
thinking of doing the inserts something like ever 5 seconds or so.

MyISAM tables are faster than InnoDB, but they are more optimised for
READS than WRITEs, however due to the replication, (being done every 5
secs on ~5 tables), I'm wondering if this will cause performance losses
due to table-locks etc.

Thanks

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to