Hi Marcel,
  Can you tell me how many slaves are connecting to the master? If there are
more than one slaves, can you please check the server id's of all the
slaves, if they are unique.
please also enable warning using log-warnings=2 in the config file, so that
warnings are logged, which can give a clue what is happening.
also let me know what are all the replication related paramenters that are
set in the cnf.

Regards,
Chandru
www.mafiree.com

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ananda Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> did u check if any of the file system holding bin-logs/data files are
> having
> enough free space.
> If the slave runs out off disk space, then you need to rebuild the slave
> from scratch.
>
> regards
> anandkl
>
>
> On 12/8/08, ewen fortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Marcel Grandemange
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>WHat errors are you getting when you try and start the slave?
> > >
> > > That's the exact thing....
> > >
> > > mysql> show slave status\G
> > > *************************** 1. row ***************************
> > >             Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
> > >                Master_Host: 192.168.11.252
> > >                Master_User: cjcrepl
> > >                Master_Port: 3306
> > >              Connect_Retry: 60
> > >            Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005
> > >        Read_Master_Log_Pos: 98
> > >             Relay_Log_File: gw2-relay-bin.000099
> > >              Relay_Log_Pos: 235
> > >      Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005
> > >           Slave_IO_Running: Yes
> > >          Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
> > >            Replicate_Do_DB: cjcd0,cjcd0
> >
> > Here you are filtering your replication, are you happy the filter is
> > correctly applied and that you understand this configuration option.
> >
> > Peter from Percona wrote a blog post about this last year.
> >
> http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/11/07/filtered-mysql-replication/
> >
> > >        Replicate_Ignore_DB:
> > >         Replicate_Do_Table:
> > >     Replicate_Ignore_Table:
> > >    Replicate_Wild_Do_Table:
> > > Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table:
> > >                 Last_Errno: 0
> > >                 Last_Error:
> > >               Skip_Counter: 0
> > >        Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 98
> > >            Relay_Log_Space: 235
> > >            Until_Condition: None
> > >             Until_Log_File:
> > >              Until_Log_Pos: 0
> > >         Master_SSL_Allowed: No
> > >         Master_SSL_CA_File:
> > >         Master_SSL_CA_Path:
> > >            Master_SSL_Cert:
> > >          Master_SSL_Cipher:
> > >             Master_SSL_Key:
> > >      Seconds_Behind_Master: 0
> > > 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
> > >
> > > According to the slave all is running and 100%, although the data is
> > visibly
> > > outdated.
> > > And updates to tables or even new tables do not replicate since
> > connectivity
> > > loss..
> >
> > This Seconds_Behind_Master: 0
> > combined with Slave_IO_Running: Yes and Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
> > indicate that the slave is both up to date and running without
> > problems caused by connectivity issues.
> >
> > How are you testing the differences between tables? to really know
> > what is different you need to perform something like a table checksum,
> > maatkit has a tool for that.
> >
> > http://www.maatkit.org/doc/mk-table-checksum.html
> >
> > If there really are differences between the two versions of table data
> > I would suggest you are either filtering replication incorrectly
> > (remember what filters are for master and which are for slaves) or you
> > are using non-deterministic functions which when executed on the slave
> > give a different result, something like this.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/09/29/why-audit-logging-with-triggers-in-mysql-is-bad-for-replication/
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ewen
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>What does the error log say?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Good Day.
> > >>
> > >> Im wondering if someone can assist me.
> > >>
> > >> Ive been using replication for a while now and it tends to fail very
> > >> easily.
> > >>
> > >> One of my sites lost connectivity for a while and when it came back
> > >> obviously replication broke again.
> > >>
> > >> How can I get it to populate all data from master again?
> > >>
> > >> Load data from master; is being depreciated and doesn't really work
> > >> anyhow.
> > >> I do not wish to create dump and do this manually every time it fails.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Advise?
> > >>
> > >> Also is replication really this unreliable? It breaks at the slightest
> > >> hiccup...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> MySQL General Mailing List
> > >> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> > >> To unsubscribe:
> > >>
> http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ______________________________________________
> > >> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> > >> http://www.netintelligence.com/email
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > MySQL General Mailing List
> > > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > MySQL General Mailing List
> > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> > To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to