>>WHat errors are you getting when you try and start the slave? > > That's the exact thing.... > > mysql> show slave status\G > *************************** 1. row *************************** > Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event > Master_Host: 192.168.11.252 > Master_User: cjcrepl > Master_Port: 3306 > Connect_Retry: 60 > Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005 > Read_Master_Log_Pos: 98 > Relay_Log_File: gw2-relay-bin.000099 > Relay_Log_Pos: 235 > Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005 > Slave_IO_Running: Yes > Slave_SQL_Running: Yes > Replicate_Do_DB: cjcd0,cjcd0
>Here you are filtering your replication, are you happy the filter is >correctly applied and that you understand this configuration option. Yes, I only desire that db to be replicated. >Peter from Percona wrote a blog post about this last year. >http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/11/07/filtered-mysql-replication/ > Replicate_Ignore_DB: > Replicate_Do_Table: > Replicate_Ignore_Table: > Replicate_Wild_Do_Table: > Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: > Last_Errno: 0 > Last_Error: > Skip_Counter: 0 > Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 98 > Relay_Log_Space: 235 > Until_Condition: None > Until_Log_File: > Until_Log_Pos: 0 > Master_SSL_Allowed: No > Master_SSL_CA_File: > Master_SSL_CA_Path: > Master_SSL_Cert: > Master_SSL_Cipher: > Master_SSL_Key: > Seconds_Behind_Master: 0 > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > According to the slave all is running and 100%, although the data is visibly > outdated. > And updates to tables or even new tables do not replicate since connectivity > loss.. >This Seconds_Behind_Master: 0 >combined with Slave_IO_Running: Yes and Slave_SQL_Running: Yes >indicate that the slave is both up to date and running without >problems caused by connectivity issues. >How are you testing the differences between tables? to really know >what is different you need to perform something like a table checksum, >maatkit has a tool for that. Visibly! The Master DB has many more tables that wheir created during connection issues than the slave does. There is a massive difference. I can provide screen shots if needed. >http://www.maatkit.org/doc/mk-table-checksum.html >If there really are differences between the two versions of table data >I would suggest you are either filtering replication incorrectly >(remember what filters are for master and which are for slaves) or you >are using non-deterministic functions which when executed on the slave >give a different result, something like this. >http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/09/29/why-audit-logging-with-trigg ers-in-mysql-is-bad-for-replication/ Nothing of the kind. >Cheers, >Ewen > > > > >>What does the error log say? > > > >> Good Day. >> >> Im wondering if someone can assist me. >> >> Ive been using replication for a while now and it tends to fail very >> easily. >> >> One of my sites lost connectivity for a while and when it came back >> obviously replication broke again. >> >> How can I get it to populate all data from master again? >> >> Load data from master; is being depreciated and doesn't really work >> anyhow. >> I do not wish to create dump and do this manually every time it fails. >> >> >> Advise? >> >> Also is replication really this unreliable? It breaks at the slightest >> hiccup... >> >> >> -- >> MySQL General Mailing List >> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql >> To unsubscribe: >> http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=john.dais...@butterflysystems.co.uk >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence >> http://www.netintelligence.com/email >> >> > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=ewen.fort...@gmail.com > > __________ NOD32 3670 (20081208) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org
