Am 08.03.2015 um 13:20 schrieb Thufir:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:47:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:oh my god............... https://www.google.at/search?q=ssh+tunnelhmm, are you thinking that I'm not using ssh? Because I'm using ssh currently, and it works fine.
no, i am thinking you have no clue what a SSH tunnel nor a TCP connection are, otherwise this thread won't exist
How is ssh -L 3305:localhost:3306 thufir@192.168.1.3 any better or more useful than ssh thufir@192.168.1.3 ?
boah the one is a ordinary SSH shell and the other is having the remote mysqld server listening on localhost
The process described here: http://quintagroup.com/services/support/tutorials/mysql-linux doesn't seem demonstratively better, or even different, than just using ssh to login, and then logging into MySQL. However, I've seen that approach mentioned quite a bit. What's the advantage?
that you can have a local application using mysql by -h 127.0.0.1 which is a complete different thing than a interactive shell?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
