On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0500, Wendell Dingus wrote:
>
> I'm fairly certain this is a bug. It's on 3.23.46-max and the
> changelog for .47 doesn't mention it.
> 
> I have 2 servers using replication. Server1 is used by client
> machines and all updates are to it. Server2 stays in perfect sync
> with it and logs all updates to it's own binary log. I then use
> mysqlbinlog from server2 to parse out those database changes every
> half hour or so and send to another server via a (part-time)
> internet connection where it attempts to maintain a synced copy of
> the data as well. A "modify table" to add a new field on server1
> propogates to server2 but NOT to the third server. I've not tracked
> down exactly where things are breaking down yet. Server1 and 2 are
> Linux and are using INNODB tables. Server3 is not Linux and is not
> able to use INNODB at the moment. Even a "create table
> ... type=INNODB" works on server3 making the table MyISAM
> instead. It's just the modify table statements with the addition of
> a new field that don't make it.
> 
> I've not captured and analyzed one of the binary logs yet but will
> try to do so. Just wanted to let someone know of a probable
> bug. I'll also upgrade to .47 and report back if that resolves this.

But you can see the query in the binary log?  Is it just a case of
mysqlbinlog not extracting the query properly?

Jeremy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to