On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:18:08AM -0500, John Kemp wrote: : Hank, : : 3. Do not use the RH mysql version. Get it from the Mysql website, and : use 3.23.47-max (which includes Innodb support) or higher.
What's wrong with the RH mysql version? I've been using it for 5 months without a problem. It has built-in support for both BDB and InnoDB tables and doesn't appear to have any problems with enterprise-class systems. Then again, we're using InnoDB tables, so we're not limited by file-size. Is there a reason to use MySQL's version over RH's? The only difference I can see is that RH's compiles it to work with different (read: standard RH) filesystem layouts, uses the standard RH initialization files, and has some RH-tuned config files. They're not patching the source at all, and my understanding is that the compile options are verified for the specific RedHat version. * Philip Molter * Texas.net Internet * http://www.texas.net/ * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
