On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:01:55PM +0700, David Garamond wrote: > Sven K?hler wrote: > >I was very disappointed by Interbase/Firebird. It seemed to me like a > >MS-Access: a database-engine that works on regular files > > Firebird seems simple, but it doesn't mean it's inferior or > [intentionally] crippled like MS-Access. SQL server also works on > "regular files" (db is stored as single files) and I believe FB is > comparable to SQL server. > > In fact, I personally hate the fact that InnoDB can't work on "regular > files" (db is not stored on single files or single directories).
That's already fixed in 4.1.1. -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
