Jan Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Money is not really an issue but of course we don't want to waste it for > scsi-hardware if we can reach almost the same speed with hardware > sata-raids.
'Almost' is a key word. Some SCSI disk are working at 15k RPM, which will give you a HUGE MySQL performance growth compared to 10k disks. AFAIR, there are no 15k RPM SATA disks yet. > Money is not really an issue but of course we don't want to waste it for > We'd like to stay with x86 because all our hardware is intel/amd and all > our servers are running debian-linux. Can we expect better performance > or problems using kernel 2.6.x? You can expect better performance on kernel 2.6.x of course, especially on multiple requests. -- For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/ __ ___ ___ ____ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Egor Egorov / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ MySQL AB / Ensita.net <___/ www.mysql.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
