I have always used a business  credit card to pay for all salon product and 
supplies. More documentation the better when it comes to taxes. I pay the bill 
in full each month so that I avoid interest charges, I also save on COD charges 
when products are shipped to me. I earn points on this credit card, too and 
there is no annual fee. Credit cards can help you save money if you use them 
the right way. I get a free airline ticket to the Las Vegas Hair and Nail 
Conference every other year because of my responsible use of my business credit 
card. Credit cards are not the root of all evil, irresponsible credit abuse is.

Katherine
St. Louis, MO
Sent from my iPad

On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Rhonda Kibuk <[email protected]> wrote:

Personally this sounds like a way to INCREASE credit card debt in America.  May 
this is an underhanded way to bail out the banks, yet once again.
 
R

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Diana Bonn <[email protected]> wrote:
I know this is boring to some, but you have to realize that this impacts the 
way you file your taxes (write offs/deductions) next year for your nail biz.  
So if you know what is going to happen, you can simply change your buying 
habits to save you alot of grief and bull crap when you do your 2011 taxes,

As I stated before, this new tax requirement concerns our PURCHASES of 
products, services goods for your business. If you purchase more than $600.00 
per company, you have to file a 1099 form and give it to this company.  
Example, you purchase all year long 600.00 worth of office supplies at Staples, 
your receipts add up to 600.00, you have to contact staples, get their Federal 
ID number, and GIVE THEM a 1099 form.

How you can avoid this new tax requirement is either pay by credit/debit 
card.....you DO NOT have to file a 1099 form if you pay by credit/debit card.
If you pay by cash/check you have to file the 1099 form.
If you don't want to file a 1099 form and your receipts total up to 600.00 or 
more, YOU CAN'T write it off as a deduction.

Anyway, below is a post I received about the Senate trying to block this.  It 
failed.  A couple of Senators even tried to make the filing of 25 or more 
employees and even up the 600.00 to 5,000.00 dollars. It didn't work.  This is 
all part of the Obama Health Care package.

As I hear more I will let you know.  This all just happened and I can't find 
anything in the news as of right now.  I don't know if this will be repealed or 
not.  If the Fall elections change in the House and Senate, don't know if this 
will get changed.

I just wanted you to realize that starting in January 2011 you may want to take 
advantage of anything you pay with cash/check and expect to spend more thatn 
$600.00 at one location, you may want to change to credit/debit card to save 
you the headache of filing 1099 forms.  diana from indiana





By Alexander Bolton - 09/14/10 12:47 PM ET
The Senate on Tuesday defeated an effort to strip a controversial tax-reporting 
provision from the sweeping healthcare law Congress passed earlier this year.

 In a 46-52 vote, lawmakers killed an amendment sponsored by Sen. Mike Johanns 
(R-Neb.) that would have saved businesses and nonprofit groups from having to 
report an array of small and medium-sized purchases to the Internal Revenue 
Service.

 A handful of Democrats voted for the Johanns proposal, including Sens. Evan 
Bayh (Ind.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), 
Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mark Warner (Va.), and Jim Webb (Va.).

 The vote puts the Senate on track to pass small-business assistance 
legislation this week or early next week.

 The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups had lobbied furiously 
in favor of the Johanns amendment. Business groups argue the new requirements 
impose a heavy cost on small businesses and will harm the economy.

 The provision, which is estimated to raise $17 billion over 10 years to pay 
for a new prevention and public healthcare fund, requires businesses and other 
groups to file 1099 tax forms to report purchases from a single supplier that 
total more than $600 in a year.

 PLEASE NOTE:  That's a 1099 for each and every time a $600 purchase or service 
is transacted.  It's going to add to the cost of whatever service or product 
the purchaser does.

 An alternative to Johann's amendment sponsored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) 
also fell short of passage. Nelson's proposal would have increased the 
reporting threshold to $5,000 and eliminated the requirement for businesses 
with fewer than 25 employees.

Nelson's amendment failed by a vote of 56 to 42, four votes short of the 60 
needed to cut off debate and move to a final vote.

Republicans expressed concerns over the Nelson alternative because it would 
have been paid for by repealing a tax break for large oil-and-gas producers.

Senate Republicans said they were not surprised the Johanns amendment did not 
attract more votes, citing staunch opposition from President Obama.

 "The White House does not want to set the precedent of rewriting the 
healthcare bill," said a GOP aide. "They don't want to admit they made any 
mistakes in the bill before the election."

 Democratic leaders scheduled the vote on the Johanns amendment to secure the 
support of Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) to advance the small-business bill. 
Voinovich had demanded consideration of the small-business reporting provision 
before agreeing to a final vote on the broader bill.

 The legislation would provide $12 billion in tax cuts to small businesses and 
set up a $30 billion Small Business Lending Fund. It would allow businesses to 
write off up to $500,000 in capital investments and 50 percent of the cost of 
new equipment. It would also increase to $10,000 the tax deduction for small 
business start-ups.

 Julian Pecquet contributed to this story.

This story was posted at 11:59 a.m. and updated at 12:47 p.m.

 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

Reply via email to