David Barak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marty's interpretation of the AUP (that it governs mail between an > MLC member and a list subscriber, whether or not it traverses > Merit's servers) is not universal, and is currently hotly debated on > the admin list. I for one do not share his interpretation. I > expect that this will be sorted out soon, and we'll post a note with > the outcome either way.
It is completely unclear to me how he could have arrived at this interpretation unless he's working from a materially different version of the AUP than the one posted at http://www.nanog.org/aup.html ---rob (ex-mlc, no hat, no hair) _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures