> > The AUP does not apply in this case. However, it does > seem > > that Marty (and > > whomever) are between a rock and a hard place with the > > > options left if private mail is not deliverable. > > Only if Marty is Lord High Poobah of the mailing list. But > he is not. There are *FIVE* other MLC members who > presumably > are not wholly dependent on gmail.com for their email. One > wonders why Marty could not have passed this case on to > other > MLC members to deal with.
Marty indicated in an email to the rest of the MLC that he forced the issue to show a problem with the current structure and content of the AUP. There were several decision points along the way where he could have chosen differently. <hat type="MLC member" value="on"> Marty's interpretation of the AUP (that it governs mail between an MLC member and a list subscriber, whether or not it traverses Merit's servers) is not universal, and is currently hotly debated on the admin list. I for one do not share his interpretation. I expect that this will be sorted out soon, and we'll post a note with the outcome either way. Sorry for the list noise, and for any confusion which is caused thereby. </hat> > Somebody needs to write a NANOG soap opera and put on > an evening performance at one of the meetings. I'm game if others are... David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
