On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Sean Figgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question of whether or not the mailing list even needs such a group > is something that should be dealt with instead. I believe the NANOG > mailing list to fall in the category of a mature mailing list. It's > pretty much going to police itself, and pretty much has. That's going > to be most effective in the long run.
While I agree with that at face value, I think it's also important to mention that the MLC was/is not just an enforcement body. Many ideas and goals that were not able to gain traction due to internal issues were focused on encouraging and fostering better dialogue, organizing summary data and posting to the wiki or other collaborative forum, and more generic user experience items that aren't directly addressed by the other NANOG committees. - Tim _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
