On Thu, 15 May 2008, Joe Abley wrote: > I have seen no problem on the NANOG list which I have attributed to > there being too many participants. What problems or attributions am I > missing?
That was my contention, based on the number of threads that go into large numbers of messages consisting largely of people wanting to be heard whether they have anything new to say or not. I can't speak for anybody else, but I certainly lack the time (or maybe just the motivation) to follow very much of what gets posted to the list these days. -Steve _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
