> I don't think that is a very good idea. Blogs tend to be > good for the blogging crowd, which is probably similar to the > forum crowd, but is different from the mailing list crowd. > They may be overlap between the three groups, but you will > definitely loose a large number of participants by moving > from the mailing list.
If you go back to the message which I replied to, he was suggesting that on a list as big as NANOG, there are too many participants. Reducing the number of participants might be a good thing. In any case the number of spectators should not change because the list will still be distributed as it always has. > Honestly, I do not think that there really is a need to fix > it, as it is not really broken. On the other hand, this is the nanog-futures list and it doesn't hurt to kick some ideas around. Sometimes the end result is that you realize the brokenness isn't as bad as it seemed. --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
