On 16 May 2008, at 15:01, Steve Gibbard wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Joe Abley wrote: > >> I have seen no problem on the NANOG list which I have attributed to >> there being too many participants. What problems or attributions am I >> missing? > > That was my contention, based on the number of threads that go into > large > numbers of messages consisting largely of people wanting to be heard > whether they have anything new to say or not. I can't speak for > anybody > else, but I certainly lack the time (or maybe just the motivation) to > follow very much of what gets posted to the list these days.
With respect, I suspect that would happen if there were 1,000 participants just as often as it does with 10,000. I don't expect a vocal minority to be less vocal just because they're less of a minority. Joe _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
