On Oct 6, 2010, at 15:25, Sean Figgins <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/6/10 8:42 AM, Randy Whitney wrote: >> As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in >> person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future >> for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least >> the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the >> past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some >> way to lift this burden from him? > > I would think that we probably need a very good and accurate transcript > of any NewNOG community meetings. Even if we did not do this for the > NANOG conference, it may be worth the cost for a couple hours. > > -Sean > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
I guess I miss the point. When I can go to nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full meeting, why would I need a transcopt? Sent from my iPod _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
