> From: Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> > Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:10:59 -0700 > > >> I guess I miss the point. When I can go to > >> nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full > >> meeting, why would I need a transcopt? > > > > If you didn't watch it live, then it's a quick way to scan through to see > > if you missed anything interesting (sometimes slides != what's discussed). > > Also, transcripts are search-engine indexible.
This is the first GOOD reason for a transcript! Thanks, Bill. I still suspect it would be cheaper to have a transcript generated from the recording after the meeting than to have a stenographer at the meeting, but I do see this as a significant benefit to a written transcript. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
