I call any upstream link 'over capacity' if either: 1) There is less than 50mb/s unused 2) The circuit is more than 50% in use
I guess by my definition a DS3 is always 'over capacity' --Phil -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Alex Rubenstein' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency bwahaha, 2 funnee. I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding another ds3 at that point. Bri ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency > > 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3? > > --Phil > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of Alex Rubenstein > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM > To: Derek Samford > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency > > > > > Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years, > and it's never been as bad as it is now. > > oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that > loaded (35 to 40 mb/s). > > Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% > loss, during business hours. > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote: > > > > > There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent > having > > latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by > > Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were > > experiencing earlier? > > > > Derek > > > > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben -- > -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net -- > > >