This is the rudest, most arrogant abuse complaint I have seen. It is a frigging dial up user.
james ----- Original Message ----- From: <RBL> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 12:32 PM Subject: Email is in RBL _ DENIED _ (by bl.spamcop.se from [EMAIL PROTECTED] reason Sending IP 65.19.17.201 support SPAM ) > You have sent a message that has been stopped! This > is because of your sending e-mailserver being listed in > an anti spam database. You should probably alert your > email administrator and/or your ISP and send this email > along to him. > > The only reason a serious ISP or email administers would > be on such a list is that he do not yet know about it being > listed. Otherwise he would already have fixed the wrongfully > configured server. Or he terminated the contract with the > offending customer that put him on that list. > > We have also tried to send this letter on the following > standardized addresses: > ======================= > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ======================= > > But very often administrators that don't know how to > configure a secure mailserver, don't know that they have > to implement these system addresses either. > And we feel that you will probably get better results > if you call or send this your self. > > Most responses we get are about the spelling and > grammar from postmasters and administrators. They > are usually angry that we have made their customers > aware about their problems. This is kind of silly as the > Information given is easy to understand anyway, and > we could have sent the letter in correct Swedish instead. > > But as our purpose in sending this is neither to make it > unreadable nor to make it offensive to anyone. Our > purpose is to inform about systems being misused or miss > configured so that the administrators gets a fair chance to > fix their servers. > > So if you're an administrators please don't get angry > just fix your email servers and we will be happy to relay > your messages again. As a result your customers will be > happy and you will get less angry calls and letters making > you happy as well. > > The few administrators, postmasters and ISP's that just > don't give a damn, will probably be noticed by their > customers anyway. As these letters will keep arriving > although they are probably just a very small part of the > end users problems. > > Please send any comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date time = 2004-09-19 18:32:03 > Subject = Our promise: to save you money on your medication. CMHSO > Message-ID = <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > rcipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > rbl list = bl.spamcop.se > ErrorMessage = 542 Rejected - see http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=65.19.17.201 > Reason = Sending IP 65.19.17.201 support SPAM > Denied IP = 65.19.17.201 > > Message Source 10 lines > ======================= > Received: from [65.19.17.201] by mailbox.sverige.net (JPHS RBL mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) with SMTP id for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:31:59 +0200 > Received: from coalesce.mail.tpnet.pl by 62.13.25.2; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:30:58 -0200 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: anthony roop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Our promise: to save you money on your medication. CMHSO > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:31:58 -0500 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 > X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.61 (1055) - Licensed Version > X-jphspassrblrun: 1 > > =======================