On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote: > > > > On Sun, 20 May 2007, Roger Marquis wrote: > > > > If not, have any root nameservers been hacked? > > > > To partly answer my own question, no. The data returned by root > > (gtld) nameservers is not changing rapidly. Thanks for the pointers > > to "fast flux" too. Wasn't familiar with this attack or terminology. > > > > All the same, it would seem to be an easy and cheap abuse to address, > > at the gtlds. Why are these obvious trojans are being propagated by > > the root servers anyhow? > > the root servers are responsible how exactly for the fast-flux issues? > Also, there might be some legittimate business that uses something like > the FF techniques... but, uhm... how are the root servers involved again? >
Small note: For regular fastflux, yes. for NS fastflux, not so much.