On 22 May 2007, Paul Vixie wrote: > > apropos of this... > > > >>As to NS fastflux, I think you are right. But it may also be an issue of > > >>policy. Is there a reason today to allow any domain to change NSs > > >>constantly? > > ...i just now saw the following on comp.protocols.dns.bind ("bind-users@"): > > +--- > | From: "Wiley Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind > | Subject: Hooray, glue updates are instantaneous! > | Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:08:13 -0700 > | X-Original-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | X-Google-Sender-Auth: fbac9c128e6c36c7 > | > | Well, maybe I've been out of the loop for a while but I just changed the IP > | address of one of our authoritative name servers on Network Solutions' web > | site and it propagated to all the gtld servers within 5 minutes. > | > | I don't know how this got "fixed" but for all readers out there who may > | contributed to making this magic happen, my hat is off to you, and I will > | quaff a brew (or more) in your honor as I consider this a significant > | contribution to the march of civilization. > | > | -W Sanders > | http://wsanders.net > +--- > > in general, we ought to be willing to implement almost anything if free beer > is going to be offered by non-criminal beneficiaries.
If it's once in a long while like with this guy... may not be worth it. :P If it's every 10 minutes like fast fluxers... I want in on that action. > -- > Paul Vixie > Gadi.