Or perhaps domains can be on-line instantly for a $100 non-refundable "rush" fee, or be cheaper and more refundable if you don't mind waiting longer (long enough to fix the tasting issues) And yes, I suppose ICANN or similar would have to collect or mandate the costs for it to affect all areas of the problem?
On 8/13/07, Dorn Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, if grandma ordered a sign printed one way, and proofread it, and > agreed to pay for it, and the printer printed it, then the printer is > normally going to want money to make another different sign. If grandma, or > anyone else, orders a domain, and confirms that's the domain they want, and > get's it activated, then they should pay at least the first years fee, no > matter what... > > On 8/13/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The real way to get rid of tasting would be to persuade Google and > > > Yahoo/Overture to stop paying for clicks on pages with no content > > > other than ads, but that would be far too reasonable. > > > > I don't see a practical way to enforce it. > > > > I believe the Net is an unstable system that will eventually be rendered > > useless > > by spam/etc. It is a cheap unlimited resource - you pay for your > > connection, > > and you get access to things you are in no way paying for. I don't see > > a way to > > fix it. > > > > Carl K > > > >
