[ should this move to nanog-futures? well, it's a quiet saturday ] > Collocation would be a useful idea - save airfare, hotel etc.
immensely difficult. the nanog sc could not even get the nanog administrative structure to avoid a direct and damaging conflict with afnog for the next meeting. if successful, it will have taken over two years of work to get a meeting in the dominican republic. ... not that this might not be worth trying. just that it is extremely far from simple. >> otoh, being on the frobnitz program committee would be an interesting >> lesson and exercise in industry physics. > You think there's not enough convergence + shared interests in such > programs? different question. what i meant was that the synergies and tensions between the subject areas would be quite evident on a joint pc, and have to be worked out. doing so would be an educational experience. > I mean, abuse + security teams could care less about MPLS and peering, > but there is a lot they're discussing (walled gardens, botnet > mitigation etc) that does get discussed in far better detail at nanog. > Or at FIRST. yes. randy