On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Matt Harris wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Carlos Friaças via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
wrote:
Hi,
Just to let everybody know that a petition was started in order to try
to enable a policy discussion about "BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy
Violation".
If you would like to read the proposal, it is available at:
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2019/ARIN_prop_266_v2/
Discussions are already ongoing at RIPE and LACNIC.
Best Regards,
Carlos
Hey Carlos,Can you (or someone else on the list, perhaps even someone who was
involved in voting this down) provide some more
details as to why it was rejected? What were the arguments in favor of
rejecting the proposal? This seems like an interesting
idea to me, and one that I can't immediately come up with any arguments against
from my own perspective. There's probably some
room for discussing and tuning specifics, but ultimately the concept seems
reasonable to me. What am I missing here?
Hi,
Sure...
https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/ac/meetings/2019_0410
(Meeting of the ARIN Advisory Council - 10 April 2019)
You can also find the RIPE and LACNIC URLs here:
+ https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03
+ https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2019-5?language=en
Best Regards,
Carlos
Thanks,
Matt
