On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 7:43 AM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > The double billing (had it been present at the time) would have prevented > > me from signing the LRSA for my IPv4 resources. > > There were some community participants that suggested > that having a formal relationship with the ARIN organization > by signing the LRSA was good for the resource holders, > and good for the overall commons.
I vaguely recall Owen being one of the most outspoken proponents. > There were other > members that suggested that signing the LRSA would be > potentially disadvantageous at some future time. I confess: I do have the urge to say I told him so. > I do > understand that some people may feel vindicated about > not signing a LRSA, Not yet. We're still at the stage where Darth Vader says, "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further." Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/
