On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 3:59 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
> > > On 2/25/22 09:04, Saku Ytti wrote: > > > Then you went too far. For many users the 40G port is there to increase > 10G density, by offering 4x10GE breakout. It is already difficult to > support 1GE customers and 10GE is starting to become problematic. But SP > networks actually have these customers, and not every application on the > Internet will always need more and more capacity, so many of these > customers have no requirement to ever purchase faster ports. > > If you live in cloudyworld, sure, denser and faster. But this mode of > thinking is making life at SP networks rather difficult. > > > 100%. > > New boxes from Juniper that have shipped with a minimum of 10Gbps when we > still have 1Gbps use-cases has meant we've put orders off. 12 months later, > they have new iterations of the boxes now allowing for all the way down to > 1Gbps. > > Check out the Adva MicroMux Nano for this use case if you haven't already. 10x 1g in a single 10g transceiver using a 24S MPO. They also have a 10x 10g in a single QSFP28 as well. > CloudyWorld is giving OEM's the impression that NetworkWorld also have the > same requirements. It's good to see some OEM's are getting back to their > roots, but it's not easy work. > > DWDM vendors are the worst, because they look at all orders with DCI eye > glasses. > > Mark. > -- [stillwa...@gmail.com ~]$ cat .signature cat: .signature: No such file or directory [stillwa...@gmail.com ~]$ cat all-opinions-are-my-own All opinions are my own and do not represent any of my employer.