On Sat, 18 May 2024 at 10:38, Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> wrote: > So, yes, I think having an open peering policy should be a requirement for > operating a root nameserver. I don’t think there’s any defensible rationale > that would support root nameservers being a private benefit to be used to > worsen the digital divide or create leverage in commercial disputes. They > should, indeed, all be accessible to all networks.
What type of network reach is required? Is single pop enough, that as long as you have single pop, and open policy to peer with anyone who wants to connect to your pop, you qualify? -- ++ytti
