On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote:
Excellent production.
... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering or alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance of important factors (settlement free peering in other ways than IXPs, for instance, is hardly mentioned).
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
