On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote: > >> Excellent production. > > ... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering or > alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance of > important factors (settlement free peering in other ways than IXPs, for > instance, is hardly mentioned).
Could you point to a single factual error please? That is a serious charge to just throw out without a single word to back up your claim. And no, "omittance of important factors" is not a "factual error" in a 5 minute video of a wide and amazingly complex topic. Put another way: If you think you can do better, then let's see your video. -- TTFN, patrick
