If anyone's ISPs are overcharging them, I will be able to provide service for no more than 1 cent per available routable IPv6 address in any netblock from /64 on up. We have a reasonable startup rate of a /56 for the price of a /64 for the remainder of 2012, even!
-george On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Derek Ivey <de...@derekivey.com> wrote: > If my ISP charged me fees for IPv6 space, I'd ditch them. They already make > enough money as is from modem/cable box rentals. > > Derek > > > On 8/3/2012 6:12 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. <o...@ocosa.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p >>> >>> Just wondering, with so many IPv6 resources in a single allocation it >>> would seem difficult to charge anything at all. >>> >>> 1. How are you making up loss of revenue on IPv4 assignments? >>> 2. Are you charging anything? >>> 3. Is the cost built into the service? >>> 4. Do you assign IPv6 space to end user and charge admin fee? >>> >>> Take care, >>> >>> Otis >>> >> IPv6 users cost me less money (CGN resources), i wish i had a business >> method for giving them discounts and meaningful incentives for using >> IPv6. >> >> Today, my retail mobile phones users can have 1 NAT'd IPv4 address or >> 2^64 public IPv6 addresses + NAT64 to reach IPv4 destinations. Most >> don't use the IPv6 address option yet :( >> >> But the number of folks electing to use IPv6 is increasing with more >> phones available (4 Androids now support HSPA+ IPv6) and more IPv6 >> awareness >> >> CB >> > > -- -george william herbert george.herb...@gmail.com