Another big-name-big-$$$ vendor whose name begins with "C". Sounds like
a "c"onspiracy to me............
On 11/14/2012 5:09 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
Careful though cause the crayons must be crayola approved
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-11-14, at 5:28 PM, "joel jaeggli" <joe...@bogus.com> wrote:
On 11/14/12 2:40 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-11-12, at 14:43, Jim Mercer <j...@reptiles.org> wrote:
Is there a common practice of providers to vet / validate requests to advertise
blocks?
Yes, most providers whose customers request a particular route to be pointed
towards them will ask for ambiguous instructions, written on letterhead with
crayon, and signed illegibly by someone who may or may not have authority to do
so but who in any case cannot be identified clearly by their scrawl.
Some providers ask for route objects and appropriate import/export
policy in RADB. that fandamently no higher quality an attestation than a
LOA but it's a lot easier to read.
Ideally the letterhead should be crudely constructed in photoshop and then
faxed across a noisy analogue line.
Once you have one of those babies in your file, no lawyer can touch you.
Joe
