This is a lot of why I have a lot of respect for the wireless guys I know or have met that clearly know their wireless, even if some of them are wingnuts outside of the wireless domain. Wireless is Hard(tm), and doesn't really overlap a lot with other ISP knowledge sets.
-Blake On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Brett Glass <na...@brettglass.com> wrote: > At 12:18 PM 7/15/2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > >> If you are picky enough to prefer other radios that cost more on Mbps/$, >> that's your call, > > > We need reliability. That particular radio wouldn't cut it. As I've > mentioned, users can get away with much less bandwidth if the quality > is high, so going for a less reliable radio with a high nominal speed > does not actually save money. > > Also, that 5 GHz radio is a "spectrum spammer" and hence is a bad > neighbor. > > After 25 years of doing wireless, one learns what really works and what > is a false economy. Believe me, we've learned some hard and expensive > lessons. > > --Brett Glass >
