Yeah, most people ignore ZH. UBNT marketing hyped it up quite a bit, and for a residential deployment it can work OK, but if you have any kind of background in wireless you'll understand that it goes out the window for a non-trivial deployment due to the requirement of all APs sharing a channel.
It's too bad they don't support 802.11r (fast roaming) and 802.11k (radio resource management). On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > What problems have you had with UBNT? > > It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the > extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density environments. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Manuel MarĂn" <m...@transtelco.net> > To: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06:39 PM > Subject: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office > > Dear nanog community > > I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that > you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me > Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with > Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for this type > of requirement was not that good. > > Thank you and have a great day > -- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net