I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment.  6 access 
points setup for public wifi.  The radio levels were quite good in various 
areas of the tradeshow however traffic would keep dropping out at random 
intervals as soon as about 300 users were online.  It wasn't my idea to use 
UBNT but it definitely turned me off of their product after digging into their 
gear...

Again as someone pointed out, for residential and perhaps SOHO applications it 
can probably work well - and in my opinion it's priced for that market.

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:23 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office

What problems have you had with UBNT? 

It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the 
extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density environments. 




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Manuel MarĂ­n" <m...@transtelco.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06:39 PM
Subject: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office 

Dear nanog community 

I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that you 
can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me Ruckus 
Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with Ruckus or 
with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for this type of requirement 
was not that good. 

Thank you and have a great day 


Reply via email to