You can also VLAN allocation through RADIUS. Our setup has a single SSID, 250-odd user accounts. User connects to the SSID & authenticates with their userid/password and is assigned to their VLAN, which connects them to the appropriate DHCP server, gateway, etc.
Makes management and segregation fairly trivial (for non-trivial values of trivial :-)). paul > On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Tyler Mills <tylermi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Most of the issues are related to firmware. Most of my UBNT experience was > with the UAP-Pro and the UAP-AC, and it wasn't a good experience. > Production firmwares seem to be of beta quality. > > For features, they can't compete with Ruckus. One thing I can think of off > the top of my head is support for tagging management on its own VLAN and > tagging wired traffic onto another. If you were to implement this on the > UBNT products you would have to SSH into every single one and implement the > features as you would on a linux box, and it might work. Ruckus, you > configure the VLAN's how you would want through the Zonedirector or the > AP's GUI and it will just work. > > They cost more, but you get what you pay for. > > On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 10:54:44 AM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Did you figure out why it was dropping out? All of it dropping out? Just >> some APs dropping? Just some users dropping? >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> >> To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, nanog@nanog.org >> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM >> Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office >> >> I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6 >> access points setup for public wifi. The radio levels were quite good in >> various areas of the tradeshow however traffic would keep dropping out at >> random intervals as soon as about 300 users were online. It wasn't my idea >> to use UBNT but it definitely turned me off of their product after digging >> into their gear... >> >> Again as someone pointed out, for residential and perhaps SOHO >> applications it can probably work well - and in my opinion it's priced for >> that market. >> >> Paul >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett >> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:23 AM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office >> >> What problems have you had with UBNT? >> >> It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about >> the extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density >> environments. >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Manuel MarĂn" <m...@transtelco.net> >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06:39 PM >> Subject: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office >> >> Dear nanog community >> >> I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs >> that you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended >> me Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with >> Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for this type >> of requirement was not that good. >> >> Thank you and have a great day >> >> >> >>